The Role of Muhammadiyah in Fostering Interfaith Dialogue and Religious Tolerance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32506/xwyv3q52Keywords:
Muhammadiyah, interfaith dialogue, religious tolerance, civil Islam, progressive IslamAbstract
This article examines how Muhammadiyah fosters interfaith dialogue and religious tolerance in Indonesia through ideas, institutions, leadership networks, and public-service practices. Using qualitative document analysis, it compares organizational statements, congress decisions, leadership discourses, educational and humanitarian initiatives, and relevant scholarly accounts published no later than 2023. The findings identify three interconnected modes of engagement. First, Muhammadiyah frames religious difference through progressive Islam, civic responsibility, non-coercion, and competition in public virtue. Second, it develops elite and transnational dialogue through prominent leaders and inter-civilizational networks. Third, its schools, universities, hospitals, disaster programs, and minority-region institutions create practical encounters in which tolerance is performed through equal service rather than discussed only as doctrine. These contributions, however, remain uneven. Central commitments do not automatically eliminate exclusivist attitudes, local resistance, or ambiguity toward minority Muslim groups and controversial questions of religious freedom. Muhammadiyah is therefore best understood not as uniformly liberal, but as a large religious civil-society organization that institutionalizes a pragmatic, theologically bounded, and socially productive form of tolerance.
Downloads
References
Ali, N., et al. (2021). Interreligious literacy learning as a counter-radicalization method: A new trend among institutions of Islamic higher education in Indonesia. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 32(4), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2021.1996978
Burhani, A. N. (2019). Between social services and tolerance: Explaining religious dynamics in Muhammadiyah. In N. Saat & A. N. Burhani (Eds.), The new santri: Challenges to traditional religious authority in Indonesia. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
Jubba, H., et al. (2022). The contestation between conservative and moderate Muslims in promoting Islamic moderatism in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2116162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2116162
Menchik, J. (2014). Productive intolerance: Godly nationalism in Indonesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 56(3), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417514000267
Menchik, J. (2016). Islam and democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance without liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
Miichi, K. (2020). The politics of religious pluralism in Indonesia: The Shi'a response to the Sampang incidents of 2011–12. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 8(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.12
Muhammadiyah. (2022a, June 21). Tipologi kepemimpinan elite Muhammadiyah di era Reformasi. Muhammadiyah.or.id.
Muhammadiyah. (2022b). The Muhammadiyah president’s expectations of the USA branch. Muhammadiyah English.
Muhammadiyah. (2023a, April 13). Islam melarang keras intoleransi, fastabiqul khairat panduan bersaing dengan agama lain. Muhammadiyah.or.id.
Nashir, H. (2019). Indonesia and the dynamics of progressive Islam. Muhammadiyah University Press.
Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah. (2015). Negara Pancasila sebagai Darul Ahdi wa Syahadah. Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah.
Qodir, Z. (2016). Muhammadiyah, pluralism, and religious tolerance. In H. Nakamura et al. (Eds.), Muhammadiyah’s contribution to Indonesia. Muhammadiyah University Press.
Ropi, I. (2017). Religion and regulation in Indonesia. Palgrave Macmillan.
Saat, N., & Burhani, A. N. (Eds.). (2020). The new santri: Challenges to traditional religious authority in Indonesia. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
van Bruinessen, M. (Ed.). (2013). Contemporary developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the conservative turn. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.





